Hey Reader I need to confess something embarrassing. For years, I was the worst kind of engineer. The kind who spent 100 hours perfecting code for apps that never launched. Clean architecture. Zero bugs. Fully scalable. And completely worthless, because nobody used them. Here's The Painful TruthWhile I was busy "doing it right"... Non-technical founders were shipping garbage code and making money. My perfect projects were sitting in GitHub repos. Their messy apps took daily payments. The math hit me like a truck: Perfect code for a product nobody wants = $0 Messy code for a product people love = life-changing money What Changed EverythingI stopped trying to build the perfect app. I started trying to build the app people actually wanted. Ship first. Validate with real users. THEN make it perfect. Not before. Not "just in case." Only when people prove they'll pay. This is the hardest lesson for engineers AND vibe coders people. But it's the ONLY thing that works. What I Tell My Students NowYour first version will suck. Ship it anyway. If people use it despite the bugs, you're onto something. If nobody cares, well, you just saved yourself 100 hours of polishing a turd. The market doesn't care about your architecture, or feelings. It cares if you solve their problem. The New RuleShip fast → Validate hard → Rebuild if it works That's it. That's the whole game. Stop polishing products that don't exist yet. Stop planning apps that will never launch. Stop letting "best practices" become expensive procrastination. Are you ready to ship? Rob P.S. Want to learn how to build fast without getting stuck in perfectionism? Join the waitlist for my AI Coding Blueprint which I'll update with the latest and greatest AI coding methods for non-tech founders who want to launch fast. |
Coder of 20+ years teaching non-technical people how to build their own software business in 30 days with AI. No devs or code required.
Hey Reader, I just spent hours building the exact same app twice. Same prompt. Same tech stack. Same features. The only difference was that one used Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Claude Code), and the other used GPT-5 (Codex CLI). And holy sh*t, the results were not even close. Let me show you what happened. The Test I built a simple to-do list app with user authentication. Nothing crazy. Just login, add tasks, edit them, delete them. I even told both models: "Keep it super secure." Should be easy...
Hey Reader, Two days ago my student messaged me. He was almost angry... "GPT-5 worked for 23 minutes and then said it doesn't understand!" Oof. That's rough, and I know how this feels. But that's when it hit me. We're all prompting AI wrong. Everyone of us. The $200,000 Mistake Big tech pays prompt engineers $200k+/year. Because they know what a difference of good prompts. Imagine telling your GPS "go somewhere nice" instead of an actual address One gets you lost. One gets you there. So I did...
Everyone overcomplicates building with AI. Especially engineers. They come from a background where planning is everything. Think it out 10 times over or problems down the road, right? I get it, and this used to be my reality. But it's not anymore, and it's not what I teach today. Here's the Thing How engineers use AI and how non-tech people use AI to build things is fundamentally different. Non-tech people listening to traditional engineers lead to terrible results. People who just want to...